From an e-mail with the ominous title “Application status.”
This is to inform you that your application for admission to the (full-time Master of Science program or part-time Master of Science program; Master of Arts program; Doctor of Philosophy) the Graduate School of Journalism is complete for review. You will receive a decision from the Committee on Admission by April 1, 2008.
Five weeks and five days to go.
I missed this when it first came out, but it echoes something I’ve been saying for a while now: The newspaper “business” is actually several businesses in one, and keeping them all lashed together, like some three-legged-race gone horribly awry, doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Most newspapers don’t have a core competency. They have several. They are much closer to vertical monopolies than they are to point solution providers. They are not just news gatherers and reporters and editors. They are printing companies. They are distribution companies. They are ad sales companies. They are direct marketing companies. They are digital media companies. Many are good at all of these functions. Digital competition and audience fragmentation are fracturing the business models that have built these great, vertically integrated companies. While they are clearly not sustainable as they are, they might be quite sustainable in horizontal pieces. Here is my thinking:
* Local news and news editing. Newspapers are generally pretty good at local news and news editing. The problem is, they can only leverage that capability in their print newspapers and on their Web sites, and the two together are not likely to be able to pay the bills required to run great newsrooms. OK. Why not spin them out as news companies, continue to have them providing news to the print and Web precuts, but permit them to service any number of other businesses, from newsletters to specialty weeklies to global news services? Let them free to do what they do best and to develop new and diverse customer bases.
* Distribution. Newspaper companies are one of only a few companies that pass virtually every home in their markets once a day and have the capacity to deliver physical products. Many newspapers have had success converting their distributors into alternative distribution networks, delivering everything from magazines to marketer samples to other print news products. Let these folks free to find the best ways to pay for the trunks, cars, drivers and gasoline.
* Ad sales and direct marketing. Newspaper companies are generally the leading sellers of advertising in their markets. Why sell just for the newspaper? Why not sell for other local media? Why not sell for national media to local advertisers? Why not become local marketing solutions companies, since most local markets have very few ad agencies that have expertise beyond creative and strategy? Let sales sell, and let them fill up their quiver with lots of other media and marketing solutions.
* Printing. Printing is very expensive, and getting more so. The commercial printing business is growing fast, and many newspapers run commercial printing as a sidelight, to help defray the capital investments in printing and plant and the expenses to run them. Why not make commercial printing the primary role of the operations and make the newspaper just another client? Let the printers print for everyone.
* Digital. Most newspaper companies have local Web sites and digital teams. While they help the newspaper “go online,� many of the things they do go well beyond the normal role of the local newspaper, whether it be in Web site design, email newsletters, qualified lead generation, search marketing, and much much more. How about letting the digital folks free to build the best digital businesses possible, and just have them license the news feeds and leverage the sales company, if they so desire.
Is disaggregating a newspaper company much easier said than done? Certainly. Is doing it probably one of the keys to survival for many newspaper companies? I think so. What do you think?
(Source.)
I have not posted on this site — I just was told about it minutes ago — but Angry Journalist may be the best Web site ever. (I’m also not particularly angry, although many of their complaints ring true with me — about other papers, obviously.)
It may not be safe for work, especially if you work in a newsroom and your boss catches you posting there.
The reason for the site’s creation is outlined here:
And that led to the third reason why I wanted to create AngryJournalist.com. I thought, “maybe if it became big enough, executives at media companies would take note and realize how frustrated their employees actually are in the industry and do something to change it.�
The site is interesting, and several recurrent themes emerge when reading the posts, especially a clash of generations, with older, more establishment journalists seeing the new crop not understanding there’s a value in the way things have been done in the past, and newer and (typically) younger journalists seeing the old guard as just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic “because that’s how we’ve always done things.”
Anyway, pretty cool site.
So, Google News now has a local news feature. I’ve had it set to e-mail my phone with any news with the keyword “Hesperia” for a while now, although that means I periodically hear about wrestlers from Hesperia, Michigan or the Hesperia hotel chain. Now, I can narrow things down by ZIP code instead. It’s not immediately obvious that it’s a big improvement for me, but for folks in a smaller community, being able to zero in by your ZIP code will let you see what’s happening in your neck of the woods, even if you live in New York or something.
And if you live in New York, there’s another alternative for you: EveryBlock, which currently only serves NYC, Chicago and San Francisco, but it collects more data than Google News does, including Flickr images from the area.
It’d be interesting to see this model applied somehow to more traditional media.
Despite earlier predictions of a delayed launch, the revised site was able to be launched today, just before lunchtime. There are a few kinks yet to be worked out — I really need a new HUSD and sheriff’s department logo, and the internal pages have a few minor issues — but I think it’s an upgrade. Putting more news on the front page is always a good thing, when it doesn’t turn into clutter.
In April, once the rest of Freedom has gotten on board with this revised platform, we should be able to go in and fine-tune the Star’s colors to match the hard copy version of the paper.
|
|
|
|
